Compare · SHL alternative

SHL-grade science. Startup-grade speed.

SHL earned its reputation over decades. 5Profiler measures the same trusted constructs — Big Five tradition, adaptive ability, expert-keyed judgment — and gets you live in a week, with three answers per candidate instead of a scores appendix.

To first pilot

1 week

Personality depth

30 facets

Answers

3 per candidate

The difference

Modern delivery of established science

The constructs are peer-reviewed and familiar. What changes is everything around them: adaptive sittings, instant plain-language reports, and a benchmark built from your organisation instead of a generic norm table.

  • Live inside a week — role configuration, a test campaign and real candidates — not a quarter-long implementation.
  • Plain-language reports — facet depth your panel can read without an occupational psychologist on call.
  • Your benchmark — scored against your declared values and your real team, not only population norms.
  • One platform — assessment, proctoring and structured interviews on one candidate record, one contract.
The switch, in practice

Side by side, plainly

Positioning compiled from public pages — the full dated matrix with sources lives on the comparison page.

SHL

as positioned on their public pages

PricingQuote-only
Time to liveEnterprise implementation
ReportsSpecialist-oriented
BenchmarkNorm-group referenced
Retention signalNot published
InterviewsSeparate tooling

5Profiler

one platform, one contract, one candidate record

PricingQuoted plainly · pilot-first
Time to livePilot inside a week
ReportsPlain language, panel-ready
BenchmarkYour values, your team, your role
Retention signalStay answer on every report
InterviewsSame platform, same record

Vendor positioning compiled from public product and pricing pages; see the dated, sourced matrix on the comparison page. Spotted an error? Tell us — we correct fast.

Parallel-run a pilot See the full comparison

Before you ask

Questions we always get

Is the science comparable?

The constructs are the ones the literature validates — Big Five tradition personality at facet depth, adaptive cognitive measurement, expert-keyed situational judgment — with reliability documentation available to your assessment team on request.

Can our I-O psychologists review it?

Please do — the technical documentation pack is written for exactly that review, and the research library publishes sixty sourced briefings on the underlying science.

What does switching cost?

Start with a parallel-run pilot on one role — you keep the reports and the comparison either way.

Go deeper in the research library: what test scores mean · setting cut scores.

Book a demo

See the science on your roles, this week.

A 30-minute walkthrough with your roles, not a canned deck — and a sample report to keep.